Waikapu Sugar Co. v. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co.
Hawaii Supreme Court
Appeal Prom Order op Judd, C.J.
1Opinion of the Court
Decision op
Judd, C.J.,
Appealed Prom.
The plaintiff is a corporation, incorporated and existing under the laws of the Hawaiian Islands. The defendant is a corporation, incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of California, United States of America, carrying on business in this Kingdom. The complaint avers that the defendant has unjustly, etc., taken into its exclusive use and occupation certain portions of the lands of Waikapu and Pulehunui, on Maui, describing them by metes and bounds, to which lands the plaintiff and defendant are equally entitled in fee by purchase as tenants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- American Insurance v. OakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
- Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Mahone v. Manchester & Lawrence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Myres v. YapleMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chun v. Board of TrusteesHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. ArmstrongHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
- Fidelity Insurance v. HenryHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
- Fidelity Insurance v. HenryHawaii Supreme Court · 1912