Legal Opinion

Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. Armstrong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal eeom Ciecuit Judge, Eiest Ciecuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

WILDER, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a decree dismissing a bill to enjoin tlie defendant from maintaining a certain iron pipe *259used for the conveyance of wafer across Lehua Avenue, Pearl City, Oahu, and under the railroad track of the plaintiff.

The facts disclosed on the trial of the case were as follows: In Pebruary, 1895, defendant leased from plaintiff about seven acres of land on the easterly side of Lehua Avenue at a rental of $20 annually for the first five years and $40 annually for the next five years with an option to purchase the same for $2100 within…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Baker v. BesseySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882
  5. Waikapu Sugar Co. v. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bremer v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. McBryde Sugar Co. v. Koloa Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Medeiros v. Koloa Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Levi v. MakaleiHawaii Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Oahu Railway & Land Co. v. ArmstrongHawaii Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API