Cramp v. Dady
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Alice A. Davis and others, from a judgment of the County Court of Queens county in favor of the plaintiff and certain of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 29th day of November, 1911, upon the decision of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, P. J.:
The action is partition. The plaintiff and the defendants Miles and Dady assert the same title, and contend that the other defendants, appellants, have been divested of all interest. As to the defendants Smalley (born Bedell) and her father, Bedell, of which defendants the former is the only heir at law and next of kin of her mother, Mary Ann Bedell, and the latter was the husband of Mary Ann Bedell, the plaintiffs contend that Mary Ann Bedell’s estate as remainderman *323in fee in and to an undivided one-tenth, of the premises was terminated by, a partition action in 1869, wherein…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Simis v. . McElroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Cheney v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Railroad Equipment Co. v. BlairNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Dingley v. . BonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hammond v. Antwerp Light & Power Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Williams v. New York Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Cramp v. DadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914