Legal Opinion

In re Rosalie S.

New York City Family Court

Decided April 3, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Philip C. Segal, J.

In this proceeding to extend foster care placement (see, Family Ct Act § 1055 [b]), respondent moves, inter alia, to quash a subpoena and subpoena duces tecum served by petitioner Commissioner of Social Services on respondent’s expert, Dr. Bernice H. Schaul. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

*177Dr. Schaul, a clinical psychologist, was appointed by the court to assist respondent’s attorney in the defense of this proceeding because respondent’s mental health is in controversy. (See, County Law § 722-c.) In this capacity, Dr. Schaul prepared a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Santariga v. McCannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Xerox Corp. v. Town of WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Marziano v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Wallace v. Benedictine HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API