Medtronic, Inc. v. Endologix, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs in this action, Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc. (collectively, “Medtronic”), have sued two of their former employees, Albert Rotondo and Brooke Keeler, and those individuals’ new employer, Endologix, Inc. (“Endologix”). Medtronic alleges that Rotondo and Keel-er have violated employment agreements they signed with Medtronic by soliciting their former Medtronic clients on behalf of Endologix. Medtronic also alleges that Endologix tortiously interfered with the employment agreements by causing Ro-tondo and Keeler…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- RK Dixon Co. v. Dealer Marketing Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003
- Fortune Funding, Llc, a Florida Limited Liability Company v. Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BrazilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. EQUITAS HOLDINGSDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006
3Cited by35 opinions
- Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Medtronic, Inc. v. ErnstDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Caperton v. AT Massey Coal Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.