Legal Opinion

Overdorf v. Fonner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 14, 2000No. 1170 WDA 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, we address whether delay damages are properly assessed where the defendant tenders primary insurance policy limits through her personal automobile insurance carrier, coupled with a full release contingency that would defeat recovery of excess liability coverage on the same accident. We conclude that a settlement offer that is tendered in exchange for the plaintiffs complete release of all parties, where there exist other assets through other insurance policies, does not constitute an offer of the full amount available for payment of a plaintiffs claim.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Berry v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Shellhamer v. GreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Brosius v. Lewisburg Craft FairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Sun Pipe Line Co. v. Tri-State Telecommunications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shay v. Flight C Helicopter Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Teamann v. ZafrisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Fonner v. Overdorf (In Re Fonner)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Fonner v. OverdorfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API