Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Oscar F. Erickson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1955No. 14708PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
The Allstate Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court awarding Erickson recovery on an automobile insurance policy for injuries suffered in an accident. Allstate contends that the trial court erred in not holding that Erickson’s representation in his application for Allstate insurance that no insurer had ever cancelled any automobile insurance against him was a materially false representation which voided his policy.
Allstate contends that the insured made such a material misrepresentation to it in marking X in the square before the word…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Island v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Farmers Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. CalkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- American Glove Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. MoldenhauerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Woodman v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Strong v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Ashley v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Dariano v. BLOCKSOMSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Penn. v. Bert SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.