Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1996No. 1996-0432PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 363.] COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. CLARK. [Cite as Columbus Bar Assn. v. Clark,

1996-Ohio-385.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Two-year suspension with final eighteen months of suspension stayed on condition of reimbursement to clients within six- month actual-suspension period—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Failing to carry out contract of employment—Prejudicing or damaging a client during course of representation—Failing to cooperate during an investigation. (No. 96-432—Submitted May…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HatfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API