Legal Opinion

Smith v. Skow

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Clinton District Court. — Hon. A. J. House, Judge. Action on a note and for the foreclosure of a mortgage securing it. Decree for plaintiff, and the defendant Clinton county appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKjnne, J.

I. In October, 1892, the defendant, Skow, and wife, for the purpose of securing the payment of two thousand dollars, in accordance with the terms of a certain promissory note, executed and delivered to plaintiff, a mortgage upon certain, real *641estate, situated in the city of Clinton, Iowa. The mortgage as recorded on October 8, 1892, is due, and unpaid. In the fall of 1893, and the winter of 1893 and 1894, and ever since that time, the building situated upon said real estate has been used and occupied by the defendant, Jones, the grantee of Skow, for saloon purposes, and he has maintained and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bibbins v. W. W. Clark & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. New England Loan & Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hodge v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Des Moines Brick Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Hodge v. Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Marshall County v. KnollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Universal Credit Co. v. MammingaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API