Legal Opinion

Forister v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1976No. 12418PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

This is the third time that this case has been appealed to this Court. Our opinion in the first appeal is reported in Forister v. Coleman, 418 S.W.2d 550 (Tex.Civ.App.1967). There, we reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for a new trial. The Supreme Court first refused application for writ of error, then on motion for rehearing issued a per curiam opinion refusing the application for writ with notation of no reversible error. 431 S.W.2d 2 (Tex.1968). The case was retried and again appealed to this Court. We reformed the judgment and affirmed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Forister v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Coleman v. ForisterTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. MacDonald v. FollettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Coleman v. ForisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Musgrove v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  2. Reaves v. Lindsay, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. William Coale and Julie Coale v. Ronald Scott, Hazel Scott, Jacqueline Scott, Judy Saur, Shea Saur and Heather Saur, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
  4. William Reaves and Linda Reaves v. Sheldon Lindsay and Wife, Elaine Lindsay, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API