Legal Opinion

Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided November 29, 1982No. 81-1285C(4)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

553 F.Supp. 545 (1982)

Loyd S. DACE, Plaintiff,

v.

ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

No. 81-1285C(4).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

November 4, 1982.

Opinion on Motion for New Trial November 29, 1982.

Bruce Nangle and Michael P. Bastian, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

Gerald Tockman, Louis N. Laderman, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

HUNGATE, District Judge.

The Court finds that based upon all of the evidence presented, and the principles announced in Halsell v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, 683 F.2d 285 (8th Cir.1982) and Lovelace v. Sherwin-Williams, 681 F.2d 230 (4th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Wilbur L. LOVELACE, Appellant, v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. Henry P. Halsell v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Richard R. REEVES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loyd S. DACE, Appellant, v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Loyd S. DACE, Appellant, v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API