Mitchell v. Gazzam
Ohio Supreme Court
This is a Bill in Chancery, to review a decree of the Supreme-Court of Hamilton county. The original bill was filed by Gazzam and Butler, creditors of the late George H. Young, and set forth, in substance, that said Gazzam *310] and Butler, suing for themselves, and for such Mother creditors of the late George H. YouDg as might make themselves parties, had recovered judgments against G. H. Hill, administrator of Young, at ■the January Term, 1839, of the Superior Court, one…
Read the full summary
This is a Bill in Chancery, to review a decree of the Supreme-Court of Hamilton county. The original bill was filed by Gazzam and Butler, creditors of the late George H. Young, and set forth, in substance, that said Gazzam *310] and Butler, suing for themselves, and for such Mother creditors of the late George H. YouDg as might make themselves parties, had recovered judgments against G. H. Hill, administrator of Young, at ■the January Term, 1839, of the Superior Court, one for $334.64, and the other for $538.63, That Adams and Shaw, plaintiffs, recovered two judgments in the same court, one…
1Opinion of the Court
Read, Judge.
This bill seeks to review a decree of the Supreme Court of Hamilton county, charging Mitchell, as trustee of all the property and effects which he received from one George H. Young, for the benefit of Young’s creditors, under the act of 1838.
*Gazzam and Butler filed a bill in behalf of themselves and other creditors of the late George H. Young, charging that they had recovered judgments against G. H. Hill, administrator of Young, at the January term, 1839, of the Superior Court of Cincinnati, and, also, that Adams and Shaw had recovered judgments against the ad- . ministrator of…
2Cited by6 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
- City of New Orleans v. KerrSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
- Gutman v. Virginia Iron Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1871
- Hilton v. RossNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Shawnee Commercial & Savings Bank Co. v. MillerOhio Circuit Courts · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.