Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Ross

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1879PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court of Buffalo county. Heard below before Gaslin, J. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

This is a proceeding in error to reverse the order of the district court for Buffalo county discharging an attachment of personal property.

A preliminary motion is interposed by the defendant in error, to dismiss the case upon two grounds:

1st. Because “ the plaintiff in error has failed to give the undertaking required by an act entitled, An act to provide for the retention of attached property pending a review on error of an Order discharging the attachment,’ ” passed and took effect February 17th, 1873. Gen. Stat., 715.

2d. “ That the original action in which the attachment mentioned in this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evans v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842
  2. Ellison v. TallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Mitchell v. GazzamOhio Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schunack v. Art Metal Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  2. Dunn v. Claunch, Gilliland and DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Steele v. DoddNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  4. National Reefer Service, Inc. v. FelmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Olds Wagon Co. v. BenedictNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API