Diane Helen Mannes v. John v. Gillespie, Sheriff
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
The district court issued a writ of habeas corpus “forever prohibiting” the retrial of petitioner Diane Helen Mannes on three murder charges. The state argues the district court should have abstained, and, alternatively, that the court erred in ruling retrial of Mannes for the three murders was barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. We affirm.
I
While driving under the influence of alcohol, Mannes struck five pedestrians, killing three and injuring two others. She was charged with three counts of murder (Cal. Pen.Code § 187(a)), one count of driving under the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Erick Arevalo v. Vicki HennessyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Florencio Dominguez v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Gilliam v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Sammy Page v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.