Legal Opinion

Diane Helen Mannes v. John v. Gillespie, Sheriff

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1992No. 91-55336PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:

The district court issued a writ of habeas corpus “forever prohibiting” the retrial of petitioner Diane Helen Mannes on three murder charges. The state argues the district court should have abstained, and, alternatively, that the court erred in ruling retrial of Mannes for the three murders was barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. We affirm.

I

While driving under the influence of alcohol, Mannes struck five pedestrians, killing three and injuring two others. She was charged with three counts of murder (Cal. Pen.Code § 187(a)), one count of driving under the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Erick Arevalo v. Vicki HennessyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Florencio Dominguez v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Gilliam v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. Sammy Page v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API