Legal Opinion

State v. Ashue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 25, 2008No. 25970-6-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKulik, J.

¶1 Debra Ann Ashue appeals her conviction for residential burglary. After she was arraigned, Ms. Ashue entered into a pretrial diversion agreement with the State. On appeal, she contends (1) the diversion program was unauthorized by the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW; (2) the waiver of constitutional rights was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made; and (3) she received ineffective assistance of counsel. A statutory diversion was not available to Ms. Ashue because she committed a felony. We hold that the nonstatutory diversion program did not violate the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tatham v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. In Re Detention of CoppinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. In re the Detention of CoppinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. AshueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Cody C. Thornock v. The Hon. Michael LamboCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API