Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Gillis Mule Co.
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
This case was tried on the second'count of the complaint, which is substantially in the form prescribed by the Code 1907, No. 15, p. 1197, for suit against a common carrier* on a bill of lading, with some additional averments made necessary by the suit having been brought against a connecting' carrier. The pleas were the general issue and special plea numbered 2, as follows:
“The defendant says that at the time said mule, for the injury to which damages are claimed in this case, w£|.s received for shipment, it was stipulated and agreed and contracted as follows:
“ ‘Unless caused by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. CulverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Montgomery & West Point Railroad v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Mobile & Girard Railroad v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. LynneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ensley Holding Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Ex Parte Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925