Legal Opinion

Ensley Holding Co. v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 8, 1934No. 6 Div. 453PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action is for personal injuries.

The first question presented on this appeal is the refusal of the affirmative charge to defendant.

The alleged injuries are claimed to have resulted from a fall in a passenger elevator operated by defendant in an office building, known as the Ramsay-McCormaek building in the city of Ensley. Without dispute plaintiff was at the time using the elevator in going to an office in the building for business purposes.

It is settled by the law of this state that in such case the plaintiff was an invitee, who, on entering the elevator, became a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Anjou v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Goddard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Davis v. South Side Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. MalletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Louisville N. R. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. SH Kress & Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Call v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. NeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Louisville N. R. Co. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API