Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tiedeman v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIULIANTE, Senior Judge.

James and Mary Tiedeman (the Tiede-mans) appeal from the August 11, 1998 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) granting Defendants’ 1 preliminary objections to their complaint and dismissing it with prejudice. We affirm.

On June 4, 1998, the Tiedemans filed an action at law against Defendants seeking monetary damages for injuries sustained by Mr. Tiedeman at the hands of City employee Charles Clark 2 while on City- owned property. The Tiedemans’ complaint alleged the following. Mr. Tiede-man was employed by Dennis F. Casey, Inc., a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Carroll v. County of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. HAWKS BY HAWKS v. LivermoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Grieff v. ReisingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Chevalier v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Feldman v. HoffmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. R.H.S. v. Allegheny County Department of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Sweeney v. Merrymead Farm, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Wilson v. Norristown Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Jacobs v. Merrymead Farm, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API