Legal Opinion

Consylman Et Ux. v. Garrett

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1949No. Appeal, 18PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

Plaintiffs brought this action in trespass against Marion H. Garrett and Robert H. Garrett to recover damages for the injurious acts committed by trespassing domestic animals. At the trial the court directed a nonsuit as to the one defendant, Marion H. Garrett, and submitted the case against Robert H. Garrett to the jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Motions for new trial and judgment n. o. v. Avere filed on behalf of Robert H, Garrett, and the action of the court below in refusing the motions is here assignéd as error by him on this appeal.

Appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Gallagher v. Kemmerer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1891
  4. Wilhelm v. UttenweilerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Mish v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ashcraft v. SaundersOregon Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API