District of Columbia v. M. E. H.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
312 A.2d 561 (1973)
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant,
v.
M. E. H., Appellee.
No. 6439.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued July 2, 1973.
Decided November 28, 1973.
As Amended December 5, 1973.
Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, and David P. Sutton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
Mervin Cherrin, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before REILLY, Chief Judge, and KELLY, FICKLING, KERN, GALLAGHER, NEBEKER, PAIR, YEAGLEY and HARRIS, Associate Judges, sitting en banc.
PAIR, Associate Judge:
This…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.