Legal Opinion

Morris v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1943No. 67PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction of the offense commonly known as disorderly conduct. The statute,1 in part, makes it unlawful for any person to use profane language or indecent or obscene words, or engage in any disorderly conduct in any street, avenue, or other public place.

The evidence was to the effect that the complaining witness and her escort, a member of the armed services, engaged a taxicab operated by the appellant to take them to the Union Station, that at the station the witness’ escort left the cab and she instructed appellant to drive her to her home…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Parmelee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Anderson v. Yellow Cab Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Jackie Cab Co. v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stovall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Duncan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. StoufferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Stewart v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. State v. PolsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API