State v. Sandoval
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Chief Judge.
{1} Defendant Anthony Sandoval appeals his enhanced sentence as a habitual offender. After this Court reversed Defendant’s sentence because of the timeliness of the extension of the time to commence trial, our Supreme Court reversed and remanded for this Court to address Defendant’s other arguments that: (1) the federal and state constitutions require that Defendant’s prior convictions be determined by a jury based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt; and (2) the State failed to prove that Defendant’s prior Colorado conviction was a felony covered by NMSA 1978, §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SimmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.