Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Mittleman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 28, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

The respondent administratrix has attacked the sufficiency of the petition in this proceeding under section 206-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act.

The petition recites that the decedent sold certain corporate stock for the purpose of turning the proceeds thereof over to the petitioner; that he thereafter placed them in a certain bank account but met his death prior to the actual transfer of the funds to the petitioner. No other facts relating to the basic underlying transactions between the decedent and petitioner are given.

A proceeding under section 206-a is basically an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In re the Estate of LearyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  3. In re the Estate of KenneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  4. Werner v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. In re the Estate of PaveseNew York Surrogate's Court · 2002
  3. ESTATE OF PAUL S. VIRGINIA, MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. In re the Estate of VirginiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. In re the Estate of VirginiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API