Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Pavese
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 30, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John B. Riordan, S.
A wise title company lawyer recently said that “death may be final, but divorce goes on for eternity” (Bagwell, Tenancy in the Entirety, NYLJ, Sept. 12, 2001, at 5, col 2). While Michael Pavese has gone to his final resting place before his divorce action was completed, he more than anyone might appreciate the irony that his death has not ended the problems of his marriage but eternally exacerbated them. Michael Pavese was a retired attorney who had worked many years as an editor of matrimonial law publications for West Publishing and was a contributor…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Rainbow v. SwisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Merl v. MerlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Estate of PiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. WeissDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- In re the Estate of KellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 2012
- Matter of PollinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020