Legal Opinion

Love v. Dampeer

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1931No. 28903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The appellants in charge of liquidation of the Crystal Springs Bank instituted suit against the appellees on a contract executed by them to the Crystal Springs Bank on October 20, 1926, at a .time when the bank was a going concern. The contract was made an exhibit to the hill of complaint and reads as follows:

“Whereas, the undersigned are stockholders and directors of the Crystal Springs Bank, Crystal Springs, Mississippi; and
“Whereas, the said bank has suffered certain losses on loans made by it, the exact amount of which losses cannot now he certainly defined; and

“Whereas, the State Banking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. KuhnMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Waul v. KirkmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Willis v. EllisMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gulfport Cotton Oil, Fertilizer & Manufacturing Co. v. ReneauMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wilkinson v. Taylor Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tillotson v. AndersMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Robinson v. McShaneMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dunham v. HintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Love v. WilsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Skinner v. RichOregon Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API