Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Rich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action by the State Superintendent of Banks to recover the amount due under an alleged contract entered into between the State Bank of Scotts Mills and the defendants who were stockholders in such bank. A general demurrer interposed by the defendant Brougher to the amended complaint was sustained and, upon refusal of the plaintiff further to plead, the action was dismissed.

After alleging the appointment and qualification of the plaintiff as superintendent of banks and the incorporation of the State Bank of Scotts. Mills, the plaintiff alleges:

III

“That on or about September 23,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. . ClydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. The Coast National Bank v. BloomSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. O'Neil v. Twohy Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Toon v. Wapinitia Irrigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Young v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API