Legal Opinion

Santana v. Hammons

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Emily Jane Goodman, J.

Petitioner Luz E. Santana (Santana), a public assistance recipient, is a disabled woman who suffers from insulin-dependent diabetes, arthritis, ulcers and chronic migraine headaches. Psychiatrists and psychologists have diagnosed her as psychotic and have treated her for depression and psychosis. She has a history of suicidal and auditory hallucinations. Ms. Santana is a recipient of public assistance. Recently, as part of the Work Experience Program (WEP or Workfare), Santana was assigned to custodial work at a welfare office. However, she missed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Brandon v. ChefetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. McCain v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Tindell v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Varshavsky v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Jamie B. v. HernandezNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Roche v. TurnerNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API