Legal Opinion
Steele v. Industrial Development Board of Metropolitan Government Nashville
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2002No. Nos. 00-6646 to 00-6649PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SARGUS, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which NORRIS, J., joined. CLAY, J. (pp. 417-40), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
SARGUS, District Judge.
Defendants have appealed the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Plaintiffs and issuing a permanent injunction prohibiting the Industrial Development Board (“Board”) and the Metropolitan Government (“Metro”) from issuing additional tax-exempt bonds to David Lipscomb University (“Lipscomb University”) or bonds to any other pervasively sectarian institution. (J.A. 1027-28). Metro and Lipscomb University also…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harold E. Steele v. Industrial Development Board Of Metropolitan Government NashvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002