Legal Opinion

Fatica Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1962No. Appeal, No. 154Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in. which the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review all concluded that the claimant was disqualified under §402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b) (1), in that she left her employment because of pregnancy and without the necessitous and compelling reason required by the law.

Theresa A. Fatica, the claimant, was employed for twelve years by the Erie Bolt and Nut Company, Erie, Pennsylvania, as a receptionist. Her last day of work was April 4,1961. She…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Progress Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Dykan Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Veitz Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Walsh Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API