Legal Opinion

Dykan Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1962No. Appeal, No. 405PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which claimant has appealed from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming the referee.

The Board of Review denied benefits to claimant on the ground that she voluntarily terminated her employment without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, as amended, 43 PS §802(b) (1), provides in part “That a voluntary leaving work because of pregnancy, whether or not the employer is able to provide other work, shall be deemed not a cause of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Quality Bakery v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Guy Gannett Publishing Co. v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Soyster Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Cotright v. DoyalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Lovrekovic v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API