Legal Opinion

Stone v. Central Surety & Ins.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 14, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiff to remand the case to the state court on the ground that the Federal Court lacks jurisdiction as the amount in controversy is less than $3,-000 exclusive of interest and costs.

It is true that the complaint demands judgment against the defendant in the sum of “Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars, with interest, together with the costs and disbursements of this action.” However, it appears from the complaint that the liability of the defendant Insurance Company is limited to $2,500 in addition to interest and costs.

The Judicial Code, Section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilton v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Reese v. HolmDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clarence Payne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Dwyer v. Ligon Specialized HaulersDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API