Legal Opinion

Guy v. G. E. Moore & Co.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 7, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 344Published

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues under Sections 7 and 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 207 and 216, for overtime wages, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees.

The complaint alleges that the defendant was employed as an independent contractor by the City of Columbia, Tennessee, to construct a water purification plant for the City to enlarge and supplement its existing water system; that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a night watchman in connection with the construction work from August 1, 1953, through October 10,1953; that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Alstate Construction Co. v. DurkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
Raymond v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
Thomas v. Hempt BrothersSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
Bravis v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
Bennett v. v. P. Loftis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.