Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Hempt Brothers
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 9, 1953No. 410PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The petitioner Thomas sued the respondent Hempt Brothers in a Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas to recover overtime wages, liquidated damages, and counsel fees under the provisions of §§ 6, 7 and 16 (b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. * The complaint alleged these facts: Hempt Brothers operate a stone quarry in Penn sylvania, use the stone in manufacturing cement mixtures, and then haul these mixtures in trucks to customers. Their customers were the Pennsylvania Turnpike, the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, an airport, an army depot, and a navy depot, all located within the state of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tobin v. Alstate Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Thomas v. Hempt Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Thomas v. Hempt Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1950
- Thomas v. Hempt Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1948
3Cited by29 opinions
- Laura Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. John D. RainesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Wesley E. Archer v. Brown & Root, Inc., and T. L. James & Co., Inc., D/B/A Louisiana Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hooper Equipment Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.