Legal Opinion

In re Lane

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided October 2, 1992No. 67,358; No. 67,359PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.:

Petitioner Doil Lane brings this appeal from the trial court’s denial of his two petitions for a writ of habeas corpus which he had filed because he was detained in jail for more than 90 days after he was arrested on a fugitive warrant from the State of Texas. He argues the trial court erred when denying each of the petitions.

Lane was arrested by Sedgwick County authorities on July 18, 1991. This arrest was based upon a fugitive warrant alleging a felony had been committed by Lane in San Marcos, Texas. Thereafter, on July 19, 1991, Lane was charged in separate proceedings in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. State v. HollimanMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Odom v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Columbia County SheriffCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. Jacobson v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Games-Neely v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Paley v. BieluchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Adam Phillip Ives v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
  4. Adam Phillip Ives v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API