Legal Opinion

Hails v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 1, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¡Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sampson — ■

Affirming.

In May, 1913, M. F. Duke and her husband, A. W. Duke, and others leased a tract of 20 acres of land'in Allen county to the White Plains Oil & Gras Company, a corporation, “for the sole and only purpose of mining and operating for oil and gas,” the lease to remain in force for a term of ten years from its date. No rentals were reserved and the lease contract contained no forfeiture clause in the ordinary sense. There was, however, a provision reading:

“The party of the second part agrees to begin a well on said premises in good faith…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berry v. FrisbieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  2. Soaper v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Bay State Petroleum Co. v. Penn Lubricating Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  4. Monarch Oil & Gas Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cameron v. LebowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. American Wholesale Corp. v. F. & S. Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Ellis v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  4. Tanner v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API