Legal Opinion
Monarch Oil & Gas Co. v. Hunt
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 16, 1921PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from Allen Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Sampson
Affirming.
To the usual terms of a printed oil and gas lease appellee, Hunt, and the appellant, Monarch Oil and Gas Company, added the following paragraph:
“In case no well or prospect hole be .commenced by said second party on said premises within three months of date thereon, all rights and obligations secured under this contract shall cease, unless the said second party shall elect to continue this lease in force from year to *316year by paying an annual rental of $1.00 per acre for all said premises, or such portion thereof as may be designated by said second…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kies v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Soaper v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Ohio Valley Oil & Gas Co. v. Irvin Development Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Keystone Gas Co. v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
3Cited by16 opinions
- Clark v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- American Wholesale Corp. v. F. & S. Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- B. & B. OIL CO. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- Justice v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Bradshaw v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.