Legal Opinion
Burt v. Burt
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1996No. 28840-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
hGASKINS, Judge.
The defendant, Brent E. Burt, appeals from a trial court judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Clinton Eugene Burt, finding that the defendant owed the plaintiff $34,272.49 on a promissory note, plus accrued interest and attorney fees. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment.
*867FACTS
This is a suit on a promissory note between a father and son. The parties were engaged in a business known as Aim to Please Cabinet Shop, Inc. On November 1, 1988, Brent Burt executed a promissory note payable to his father, Clinton Eugene Burt, for $49,192 with 7.65 percent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pasqua v. LaFourche Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Hogan Exploration v. Monroe Engineer. Assoc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- State in Interest of Muse v. RossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- EM Nominee Partnership Co. v. Arkla Energy ResourcesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Pelican Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. WolcottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henderson v. Geico General Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003