Legal Opinion
EM Nominee Partnership Co. v. Arkla Energy Resources
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1995No. 26,795-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
656 So.2d 55 (1995)
EM NOMINEE PARTNERSHIP COMPANY, Quinoco Consolidated Partners, L.P., Quinoco Petroleum, Inc. and QMH Oil & Gas, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ARKLA ENERGY RESOURCES, a Division of Arkla, Inc. Defendant-Appellee.
No. 26,795-CA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
May 12, 1995.
Rehearing Denied June 15, 1995.
F. Henri Lapeyre, Jr., Matthew J. Randazzo, III, Lapeyre, Terrell & Randazzo, for plaintiffs/appellants.
Michael E. Riddick, David N. Matlock, Blanchard, Walker, O'Quin & Roberts, for defendant/appellee.
Before MARVIN, STEWART and PRICE (Pro Tempore), JJ.
PRICE, Judge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Brown v. Drillers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Moak v. American Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Klebanoff v. HaberleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Burt v. BurtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996