Legal Opinion

Spiller v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1965PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

The only questions presented are whether, in the circumstances now to be stated, there were errors of law in the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial and the denial of certain requests relating to the motion.

At the trial it was not disputed that the plaintiff, a passenger for hire on a streetcar operated by the defendant, a common carrier, sustained injuries from the sudden stopping of the streetcar on Beacon Street, Brookline, on December 7, 1960. On behalf of the plaintiff there was “evidence of the firmness with which the plaintiff . . . was standing, of her firm grasp upon the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Berggren v. Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. DeLuca v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Commonwealth v. O'RourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Larson v. Jeffrey-Nichols Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Torre v. Harris-Seybold Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Graci v. DamonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  3. Wojcicki v. CaragherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Rolanti v. Boston Edison Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  5. Vanalstyne v. WhalenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API