Legal Opinion

Mangan v. Cline

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 25, 1987No. C6-87-222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal entered against appellant Mangan on his claim of negligence and defamation against respondent Dr. Cline, a psychiatric consultant to the Army. The trial court ruled the suit was barred by the doctrine of intramilitary immunity announced in Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950). The judgment is to be treated as a summary judgment. Minn.R.Civ.P. 12.03. We affirm.

FACTS

James Mangan was an ROTC cadet at the University of Minnesota who underwent a psychiatric examination in May 1982, just prior…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nyberg v. State Military DepartmentWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Estate of Himsel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Estate of Himsel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API