Reckess v. Goldman

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J), dated August 12, 2003, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and to vacate a notice of pendency.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the complaint and the notice of pendency are reinstated, and upon searching the *659record, summary judgment is granted to the plaintiff for specific performance of the contract…