Legal Opinion

Lanagan v. Wayne Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1912No. Calendar No. 24,933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus by Richard F. Lanagan to compel George P. Codd, one of the circuit judges of Wayne county, to set aside an order permitting another solicitor to be substituted for relator in litigation pending before said court.

1Per curiam

Mr. Alfred Canney was sued by his wife. He employed the relator as his solicitor. There was also other litigation in which relator was employed. Difficulty arose between Mr. Canney and the relator. Mr. Canney filed a petition before respondent to have another solicitor substituted in the place of Mr. Lanagan. The latter objected, unless he was paid for the services he had rendered. The circuit judge ignored Mr. Lanagan’s protest, and made the order of substitution without any conditions attached. A motion was made to set aside this order, and that was denied. Mandamus was brought to review…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wipfler v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. In re Biden's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Canney v. CanneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Jones v. DickermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. New York Phonograph Co. v. EdisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bulk Oil Transports, Inc. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. Horvath v. VasvaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API