Jones v. Dickerman
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Delators, who were attorneys of record for one Bane, the defendant in an action of ejectment, recovered judgment against him for their services in such suit, together with other claims, and obtained a portion of tbe amount thereof, by garnishment proceedings.
Read the full summary
Mandamus. Delators, who were attorneys of record for one Bane, the defendant in an action of ejectment, recovered judgment against him for their services in such suit, together with other claims, and obtained a portion of tbe amount thereof, by garnishment proceedings. Subsequently Bane applied to respondent for and obtained an order substituting other attorneys in the place and stead of relators in such ejectment suit, which order provided that the substitution should be without prejudice to relators as to any right, claim, or lien they might have upon papers in their hands pertaining to…
1Per curiam
The writ is denied, with costs, the lien being lost by judgment; and, further, the order of substi.tution complained of expressly provided for the preservation of any lien that might exist.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Wipfler v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Kysor Industrial Corp. v. D. M. Liquidating Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Lanagan v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912