Legal Opinion

Moore v. North American Van Lines

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1992No. 23719PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court setting aside an award of workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts pertinent to this appeal are not in dispute. In July-1982, appellant, a Spartanburg resident, saw a local newspaper advertisement for drivers for respondent North American Van Lines (“NAVL”). Appellant had driven for NAVL for several years in the 1970s and telephoned a friend, Keltner, who was still employed by NAVL as a truck salesman.

Keltner said appellant had been a good driver and that if appellant came to NAVL headquarters in Indiana,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fernander v. ThigpenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Cross v. Concrete MaterialsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. O'BRIANT v. Daniel Construction CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Ost v. Integrated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Beasley v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. R & G Construction Inc. v. Lowcountry Regional Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Charleston, S.C. Registry for Golf & Tourism, Inc. v. Young Clement Rivers & Tisdale, LLPCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Hill v. Eagle Motor LinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Voss v. Ramco, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Roberson v. Southern Finance of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API