Pickett v. Colonel of Spearfish
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOGUE, Senior District Judge.
Pending before this Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [doc # 69], All briefing has been received and this matter is now ripe for disposition.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
When deciding a motion for summary judgment, the Court must view the facts and all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. This statement does not represent- actual findings of fact; it is given simply to place the Court’s legal analysis within the confines of a specific case or controversy. Frix v. Florida Tile Industries, Inc., 970 F.Supp. 1027, 1030 (N.D.Ga.1997).
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Browne v. Signal Mountain Nursery, L.P.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Joens v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Colbert v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024