Legal Opinion

People v. Hidalgo

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1961No. Crim. 7258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAT, J. pro tem. *

Defendant was convicted of second degree burglary at a jury trial and his motion for new trial was denied. This appeal is from that judgment of conviction and order denying such motion for new trial.

After appellant’s motion to set aside the information made under Penal Code, section 995, was denied, he entered a plea of not guilty to the information and denied allegations of two prior felony convictions set forth therein. At the time his case was first called for trial, appellant was absent and his then counsel was relieved upon motion. When the matter was again called…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. CitrinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. People v. ProppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. TylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. BookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API