United States v. Estefani Zaragoza-Moreira
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GETTLEMAN, Senior District Judge:
Defendant Estefani Zaragoza-Moreira (“Zaragoza”) conditionally pled guilty to importing methamphetamine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. She now appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to dismiss the. indictment on the basis that the government destroyed potentially useful evidence that might have supported her claim of duress. Zaragoza argues that the district court erred by finding that the government did not act in bad faith and, consequently, did not violate her due process rights in failing to preserve the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Juan Manuel Contento-PachonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Denise RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Cosenza v. City of WorcesterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Goodrum v. HoshinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Leslie Villa v. John Henley, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- People v. Herrera CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.