Faulwell v. State

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is burglary with intent to commit theft; the punishment, enhanced under the provisions of Article 63, Vernon’s A.P.C., life.

Appellant expressly does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction for the primary offense, nor does he seek a reversal. He contends only that the judgment of conviction imposing a life sentence as a habitual criminal under Article 63, supra, should be reformed to provide for the assessment of 12 years imprisonment under the provisions of Article 62, V.A.P.C.

It is his sole claim that there was insufficient…