Curtis & Gartside Co. v. Pigg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Action by Walter H. Pigg, by his next friend, against the Curtis & Gartside Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion
ON Rehearing.
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
The exceptional force and cogency of the argument on rehearing has compelled our most careful consideration of this record. This examination has involved a study of the evidence in the case, and this study convinces us that, under and considering only the evidence of defendant, liability is shown, and that on the question of liability the jury should have been instructed to find for the plaintiff. And that the only question to present to the jury was the amount of the damages to which the plaintiff was entitled.
On the question of liability, in addition to what…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powell v. Augusta & Summerville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Chas. T. Derr Construction Co. v. GelruthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- McKinney v. State ex rel. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.