Legal Opinion

Arndt, Preston, Chapin, Lamb & Keen, Inc. v. L-M Manufacturing Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 21628PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARY, District Judge.

The plaintiff, an advertising agency, brought this action on 9 separate claims against the defendant, a chain saw and small tractor manufacturer, for advertising services rendered in the amount of $4,213.04. The defendant in its answer denied liability on all 9 claims and counterclaimed against the plaintiff in the amount of $3,919, alleging late delivery and poor quality of a sales presentation manual, one of the items in dispute in this action. Specifically the defendant alleged that the failure to have this sales book for the Fall 1955 selling season caused a decline…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dora v. DoraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Elliott-Lewis Corp. v. York-Shipley, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. HW Kastor & Sons Adv. Co. v. Grove LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trustees of First Presbyterian Church v. Oliver-Tyrone Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Transit Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Atalanta Corp. v. Ohio Valley Provision Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Atalanta Corp. v. Ohio Valley Provision Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API